Once upon a time, American Action films were crafted with meticulous attention to storytelling, complemented by memorable performances and genuine character development. However, in recent years, a noticeable shift has occurred, as big-budget productions focus more on explosive set pieces and gratuitous violence, often neglecting the essential elements that make a film truly captivating.
The Art of Action: A Reflection on Classic American Action Films
Let me transport you back to a time when American action cinema reigned supreme. The opening sequence of a classic film like “Die Hard” sets the stage with a tantalizing blend of tension and intrigue. John McClane, a flawed yet relatable protagonist, finds himself trapped in a high-rise building seized by terrorists. From the very first frame, we are captivated by McClane’s struggle against overwhelming odds, desperate to save innocent lives and reunite with his estranged wife. Each scene serves a purpose, deepening the plot and developing the character.
Now, fast forward to the present day, where the opening sequence of a contemporary American action film, Extraction 2, recently released on Netflix, leaves little room for storytelling nuance. Explosions erupt, bullets fly, and our senses are bombarded with a relentless onslaught of violence. While undeniably visually impressive, this spectacle-dominated approach often sacrifices meaningful character development and narrative coherence, leaving audiences disconnected from the on-screen mayhem. As for myself, I press the mute button on my remote, or fast forward to decide whether it’s worth a watch. I’m using this film as an example simply because I started watching it today and I turned it off to write this article.
Now I know there are a lot of you out there that won’t agree with me on this one, especially anyone who works in the film industry, who might argue that Hargrave isn’t just directing the film, he’s operating the camera, helping create the stunts, performing the stunts with his actors and he pulled off a 21 minutes continuous action shot. No cuts, an authentic 21-minute one-shot deal! I worked in film and TV for over two decades, and a 21-minute, one-shot deal loaded with action is truly an accomplishment.
We are currently experiencing an era in American action cinema, where stunt crews have risen to prominence as directors. Filmmakers such as Chad Stahelski, known for the John Wick series, and David Leitch, who directed Atomic Blonde and Bullet Train, started as stuntmen and Hargrave has followed a similar path. My question is, can we have fewer shootings, and more story, and character development?
To make my point, I shall provide four other contemporary action films that fall short, in my opinion.
Transformers: The Last Knight was a prime example of a contemporary American action film that prioritizes visual spectacle over storytelling. While the film boasts impressive special effects and dazzling action set pieces, it struggles to deliver a coherent and engaging narrative. The convoluted plot and excessive focus on CGI-heavy action sequences overshadow the potential for a deeper exploration of characters and their motivations. As a result, the film becomes a showcase of explosive spectacle rather than a compelling story. Left me with a sense of visual fatigue and a lack of emotional investment.
Geostorm also falls short in its attempt to balance spectacle with meaningful storytelling. The film revolves around a global weather-controlling network that goes awry, resulting in catastrophic natural disasters. While the premise offers potential for thrilling action and high-stakes drama, the execution fails to capitalize on these elements effectively. The film’s heavy reliance on CGI and disaster sequences overshadow the development of engaging characters and a coherent plot. As a result, “Geostorm” becomes a series of disjointed action set pieces rather than a cohesive and immersive cinematic experience.
Return of Xander Cage: The film fails to recapture the excitement and freshness of its predecessor. The plot feels formulaic and predictable, lacking the depth and complexity needed to make the action sequences truly impactful. While the film aims to provide adrenaline-fueled thrills, it often relies on over-the-top stunts and explosive set pieces that feel disconnected from a cohesive narrative. This results in a film that lacks the substance and emotional resonance necessary to leave a lasting impression.
While London Has Fallen promises a high-stakes terrorist attack on the city of London, it fails to elevate beyond generic action tropes and stereotypes. The film’s excessive violence and reliance on predictable plot twists overshadow any potential for suspense or character development. Despite the presence of renowned actors such as Gerard Butler and Morgan Freeman, the film struggles to provide meaningful performances or a nuanced exploration of its central themes. As a result, “London Has Fallen” becomes a forgettable entry in the action genre, lacking the depth and originality needed to become memorable.
The Evolution of American Action Cinema: Then and Now
American action cinema has undergone a significant evolution over the years, transforming from its humble origins to the grand spectacles we witness today. Early action films, such as the silent era’s “The Great Train Robbery,” relied on practical effects and physicality to create thrilling moments on screen.
Kurosawa’s “The Seven Samurai” pioneered the concept of assembling a team of diverse and specialized individuals to combat a common threat, a narrative structure that has become a staple in action storytelling.
Beyond its technical and narrative accomplishments, “The Seven Samurai” stands as a testament to Kurosawa’s artistic vision and his ability to elevate the action genre to an art form. The film inspired generations of filmmakers, solidifying its status as a legendary and enduring masterpiece in the realm of action cinema.
A great example of an action movie with the ability to appeal to a wide audience is Jackie Chan’s “Rush Hour“. It combines elements of East and West, fusing Hollywood-style action with Jackie Chan’s signature martial arts expertise and comedic sensibilities. The film’s cross-cultural appeal, coupled with its strong characters and engaging storyline, helped it become a global hit and establish Jackie Chan as an international action star.
Amidst the high-flying kicks and lightning-fast punches, Chan incorporates comedic moments, such as using everyday objects as makeshift weapons, improvising with unconventional fighting styles, and incorporating slapstick humor. These moments of levity, interwoven with the high-impact fight choreography, create a unique experience where audiences are simultaneously entertained by Chan’s breathtaking martial arts and amused by the comedic touches infused within the action. Chris Tucker’s character delivers rapid-fire one-liners, sarcastic remarks, and comical reactions to the intense situation. These comedic interjections serve as a counterbalance to the tension, offering moments of laughter amidst the high-stakes action.
The chemistry between Jackie Chan’s character, Inspector Lee, and Chris Tucker’s Detective James Carter creates a dynamic and entertaining duo, enhancing the overall enjoyment of the film.
Rush Hour achieves a perfect blend of action and humor. The film’s ability to seamlessly transition between thrilling sequences and comedic beats is a testament to its success as an action-comedy.
As technology advanced, action films began pushing the boundaries of what was possible, embracing cutting-edge special effects and intricate choreography. This evolution is exemplified by the transition from the gritty realism of “Bullitt” to the high-octane escapism of the “Fast and Furious” franchise. However, this evolution has not been without its drawbacks. While contemporary action films offer jaw-dropping visuals and elaborate set pieces, the emphasis on spectacle has come at the expense of compelling storytelling and nuanced characters.
The Escalation of Violence and Weapon Glamorization
One significant consequence of this shift is the escalation of violence portrayed on screen. Contemporary American action films often revel in gratuitous bloodshed and destruction, presenting a distorted reality where the resolution of conflicts is primarily achieved through brute force and firepower. The faceless hordes of disposable bad guys serve as mere targets for the heroes, further dehumanizing the act of violence and reducing its consequences.
Netflix’s platform has provided a stage for action films that prioritize the glamorization of weaponry. These films often feature an extensive array of high-powered firearms, explosive devices, and other deadly weapons, showcasing them in a hyper-stylized manner. Extraction 2 exemplifies this trend. While the film may deliver adrenaline-pumping action sequences, it places a disproportionate focus on the display of firearms and violent confrontations, reducing the narrative to a backdrop for showcasing an extensive arsenal of weapons. I don’t know about you, but I’m a hard sell and this movie didn’t cut it for me. I felt no connection to any of the characters because the storyline is nothing more than a framework to showcase Hargrave’s stunts, camera work, and lots of firepower.
These films contribute to the glamorization of weaponry. In pursuit of creating visually striking spectacles, contemporary action films often showcase an astounding magnitude and variety of weapons. From high-powered firearms to explosive ordnance, the arsenal takes center stage, becoming a promotional tool in itself. This relentless display of firepower can desensitize audiences to the true implications of violence and normalize the notion that conflict resolution hinges on a superior display of force.
The promotion of such weaponry may inadvertently contribute to a culture that already fetishizes violence and fosters a fascination with weapons.
The list of weapons used in Extraction 2 has titillated the senses of gun lovers, so much so that a website that sells firearms has published an enthusiastic article, elaborating on the Top 5 Guns of Extraction 2.
It is essential to critically examine these social implications, as the influence of cinema on popular culture is profound. By indulging in mindless violence and neglecting substantive storytelling, contemporary American action cinema risks perpetuating a narrative that favors aggression over empathy, and spectacle over substance.
I miss the days when action films balanced thrilling action with engaging narratives, providing thought-provoking entertainment that inspired and resonated on a deeper level.
Storytelling vs. Spectacle: A Battle for the Soul of Action Movies
The battle between storytelling and spectacle lies at the heart of American action cinema. Classic action films understood that action sequences should serve the narrative, advancing the story and enhancing character development. These films balanced pulse-pounding moments with meaningful dialogue and emotional arcs. In contrast, contemporary action films often prioritize spectacle over storytelling. Explosions, car chases, and fight scenes dominate the screen, while character depth and cohesive narratives take a backseat. While there is a place for breathtaking visuals, it is crucial not to sacrifice the essence of storytelling. By striking a delicate balance between spectacle and substance, action films can offer audiences a truly satisfying cinematic experience that engages both the heart and the adrenaline.
Unforgettable Characters: From Heroes to Hollow Shells
Classic American action films introduced us to a myriad of unforgettable characters who became cultural icons. From the stoic determination of John McClane in “Die Hard” to the swaggering charm of Indiana Jones in “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” these films created heroes who were not just skilled in combat but possessed depth, flaws, and vulnerabilities. These characters were relatable, eliciting empathy and investment from the audience.
Die Hard, released in 1988, stands as a shining example of exceptional action storytelling that goes beyond mere spectacle. What sets this film apart and contributes to its greatness is the meticulous attention to character nuances and development, coupled with a script that is a treasure trove of humor and inventive ideas, but it is the stroke of genius to set the story during Christmas that adds an extra layer of irony, juxtaposing the holiday cheer with the intense action unfolding within Nakatomi Plaza.
However, the true blue-ribbon winner in this cinematic triumph is none other than Bruce Willis. Bursting onto the world’s stage from relative obscurity, Willis made an indelible mark as the film’s protagonist, John McClane. Coming from his successful television role in Moonlighting, Willis seamlessly transitioned into the role of McClane, embodying a unique blend of antiheroic self-mockery and unwavering determination. The character’s battered but unbowed machismo, combined with McClane’s iconic unkempt T-shirt, became synonymous with the film’s enduring legacy.
Through Willis’s charismatic performance, Die Hard transcends the boundaries of a typical action film. McClane emerges as a relatable and humanized hero, flawed yet resilient, capable of captivating audiences with his wit, vulnerability, and unwavering determination to save the day. This depth of character solidifies Die Hard as a prime example of action storytelling at its very best. The film not only delivers heart-pounding thrills but also engages viewers on an emotional level, allowing them to invest in the journey of a flawed but undeniably heroic protagonist.
In contrast, contemporary action films often feature protagonists who are mere shells, lacking the emotional resonance and complexity that defined their predecessors. The focus on spectacle and action set pieces often leaves little room for character development, resulting in hollow heroes who are defined solely by their physical prowess. As a result, the emotional connection between the audience and the characters diminishes, leaving a void in the heart of modern action cinema.
Pioneering Performances: The Legacy of American Action Stars
American action cinema has been blessed with legendary performers who brought films to life with their charisma, physicality, and acting prowess. Stars like Arnold Schwarzenegger, Harrison Ford, Sylvester Stallone, and Bruce Willis became synonymous with the genre, leaving an indelible mark on the action film landscape. Their performances went beyond muscular prowess, showcasing vulnerability, wit, and nuanced character portrayals. These actors brought a level of authenticity and magnetism to their roles that made audiences believe in the heroes they portrayed.
Dwayne Johnson, also known as “The Rock,” has become one of the biggest action stars of recent years. With films like “The Fast & Furious” series, “Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle,” and “Rampage,” he has showcased his versatility as an actor in both comedic and action roles.
Recognized for his intense on-screen persona and exceptional martial arts skills, Jason Statham has carved a niche for himself in the action genre. With movies such as “The Transporter” series, “Crank,” and “The Mechanic,” Statham has gained a loyal following for his adrenaline-fueled performances.
Although primarily known for his work in other genres, Tom Cruise has delivered memorable action performances throughout his career. With the “Mission: Impossible” series, he has solidified his status as an action star, performing his own stunts and delivering thrilling sequences that have captivated audiences worldwide.
While Matt Damon has showcased his acting abilities across various genres, he has also made a mark in action films. The “Bourne” series, where he portrays the skilled and resourceful Jason Bourne, has become synonymous with his name and has demonstrated his capability as an action lead.
These actors have contributed to the ever-evolving landscape of action cinema, each leaving their unique mark on the genre.
The Escalation of Violence: Implications and Consequences
One cannot ignore the escalation of violence in contemporary American action cinema and its implications on society. As action films increasingly rely on graphic and excessive violence to shock and entertain, audiences may become desensitized to the real-world consequences of aggression. The faceless adversaries who are dispatched without consequence perpetuate a narrative that diminishes the value of human life. This can have a numbing effect on viewers, blurring the lines between fantasy and reality. Furthermore, the portrayal of violence as a means of conflict resolution may inadvertently glorify aggression and hinder the exploration of alternative pathways to resolve conflicts. It is essential to recognize the potential influence of such portrayals.
Classic American action films were more than just mindless entertainment; they were works of art that blended thrilling action with masterful storytelling. These films understood that action sequences alone were not enough to captivate audiences. They meticulously crafted intricate plots, well-rounded characters, and suspenseful narratives that kept viewers on the edge of their seats. Whether it was the cleverly devised heist in “Ocean’s Eleven” or the cat-and-mouse chase in Friedkin’s “The French Connection,” these films showcased the artistry of action through precise pacing, clever twists, and the skillful execution of stunts. By prioritizing substance over spectacle, these action films offered an immersive cinematic experience that stayed with audiences long after the credits rolled.
Industry pressures, creative choices, and audience demands are all factors. Balancing entertainment value with substance requires a careful approach from studios, writers, and filmmakers to create action films that are both thrilling and intellectually satisfying.
Memorable moments from classic American action films
1. Die Hard (1988)
- The tense and iconic scene where John McClane (played by Bruce Willis) walks barefoot over broken glass in order to evade the terrorists.
- McClane’s witty catchphrase, “Yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker,” has become synonymous with the film and its sequels.
2. Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)
- The awe-inspiring chase scene with the T-1000 (played by Robert Patrick) pursuing John Connor (Edward Furlong) on a motorcycle, showcases cutting-edge visual effects for its time.
- The climactic final confrontation between the T-800 (Arnold Schwarzenegger) and the T-1000 in a steel mill, culminated in a fiery battle.
3. Lethal Weapon (1987)
- The iconic “I’m too old for this shit” line from Detective Roger Murtaugh (played by Danny Glover), captures the film’s blend of action and humor.
- The intense and dynamic car chase scene through the streets of Los Angeles showcases the chemistry between Murtaugh and his partner, Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson).
4. The Fugitive (1993)
- The gripping train crash sequence, where Dr. Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford) narrowly escapes while being transported as a prisoner, sets the stage for his quest to prove his innocence.
- The tense climax atop the dam, where Kimble confronts the true killer and fights for justice.
5. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
- The thrilling opening sequence, where Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) navigates treacherous traps and overcomes adversaries to obtain the golden idol.
- The iconic boulder chase scene in the underground temple showcases Indy’s resourcefulness and agility.
Words Have Power 